“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; but fools despise wisdom and instruction” (Prov. 1:7)
The royal preacher begins his sermon at the beginning. He intends to discourse largely on knowledge and wisdom in all their aspects, and he lays his foundation deep in “the fear of the Lord.” This brief announcement contains the germ of a far-reaching philosophy. Already it marks the book as divine. The heathen of those days possessed no such doctrines. Solomon had access to a Teacher unknown in their schools.
“The fear of the Lord” is an expression of frequent occurrence throughout the Scriptures. It has various shades of meaning, marked by the circumstances in which it is found; but in the main it implies a right state of heart toward God, as opposed to the alienation of an unconverted man.
Though the word is “fear,” it does not exclude a filial confidence and a conscious peace. There may be such love as shall cast all slavish fear, and yet leave full bodied in a human heart the reverential awe which creatures owe to the Highest One. “There is forgiveness with Thee, that Thou mayest be feared.” “Oh, fear the Lord, ye His saints; for there is no want to them that fear Him!”
What God is inspires awe; what God has done for His people commands affection. See here the centrifugal and centripetal forces of the moral world, holding the creature reverently distant from the Creator, yet compassing the child about with everlasting love, to keep him near his Father in heaven. The whole of this complicated and reciprocal relation is often indicated in Scripture by the brief expression “The fear of God.”
“Knowledge” and ” wisdom” are not distinguished here; at least they are not contrasted. Both terms may be employed to designate the same thing; but when they are placed in antithesis, wisdom is the nobler of the two. Knowledge may be possessed in large measure by one who is destitute of wisdom, and who consequently does no good by his attainments, either to himself or his neighbors. Their correlation is embodied in a proverb of this book (15:2). “The tongue of the wise useth knowledge aright.” The two terms taken together indicate, in this text, The best knowledge wisely used for the highest ends.
What is the relation which subsists between the fear of the Lord and true wisdom? The one is the foundation, the other the imposed superstructure; the one is the sustaining root, the other the sustained branches; the one is the living fountain, the other the issuing stream.
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: the meaning is, he who does not reverentially trust in God, knows nothing yet as he ought to know. His knowledge is partial and distorted. Whatever acquisitions in science he may attain, if his heart departs from the living God, he remains an ignorant man. He who in his heart says “No God,” is a fool, however wise he may be in the estimation of the world, and his own.
But how does this judgment accord with facts? Have not some atheists, or at least agnostics, reached the very highest attainments in various departments of knowledge? It is true that some men, who remain willingly ignorant of God, who even blaspheme His name and despise His Word, have learned many languages, have acquired skill in the theory and application of mathematics, have stored their memories with the facts of history, and the maxims of politics. This is true, and these branches of knowledge are not less precious because they are possessed by men whose whole life turns round on the pivot of one central and all-pervading error. But after this concession, our position remains intact. These men possess some fragments of the superstructure of knowledge but they have not the foundation; they possess some of the branches, but they have missed the root.
The knowledge of God–His character and plans, His hatred of sin, His law of holiness, His way of mercy–is more excellent than all an unbelieving philosopher has attained. If a Christian has reached it, then a Christian peasant is wiser than the wisest who know not God. It is a knowledge more deeply laid, more difficult to attain, more fruitful, and more comprehensive, than all that philosophers know.
What right has an unbelieving astronomer to despise a Christian laborer as an ignorant man? Let them be compared as to the point in question, the possession of knowledge. Each is ignorant of the other’s peculiar department, but it is an error to suppose the astronomer’s department the higher of the two. The Christian knows God; the astronomer knows certain of His material works. The Christian knows moral laws, the astronomer physical laws. The subjects of the Christian’s knowledge are as real as the heavenly bodies. The knowledge is as difficult, and perhaps, in its higher degrees, more rare. It reaches further, it lasts longer, it produces greater results.
The astronomer knows the planet’s path; but if that planet should burst its bonds, and wander into darkness, his knowledge will not avail to cast a line around the prodigal and lead him home. He can mark the degrees of divergence, and predict the period of total loss, but after that he has no more that he can do. The Christian’s knowledge, after it has detected the time, manner, and extent of the fallen spirit’s aberration, avails further to lay a new bond unseen around him, soft, yet strong, which will compel him to come in again to his Father’s house and his Father’s bosom. The man who knows that, “as sin hath reigned unto death, even so grace reigns through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord,” possesses a deeper, more glorious, and more potential knowledge than the man who calculates the courses of the planets and predicts the period of the comet’s return.
Men speak of the stupendous effects which knowledge in the area of mechanics has produced in the world, and its economy. But the permanence of these acquisitions depends on the authority of moral laws in the consciences of men. If moral restraints are removed, society reverts to a savage state. Inventions in art, though once attained, are again lost. So “the fear of the Lord” is a fundamental necessity on which high societal attainments–even material prosperity–absolutely depend. True knowledge in the spiritual department, as to the authority, sanction, and rule of morality, is a greater thing than true knowledge in the material department, for the moral encircles and controls the economic in the affairs of men.
The man whose knowledge begins and ends with matter and its laws has a superstructure without a foundation. In such learning the enduring relations of man as an immortal have no place, and the fabric topples over when the breath of life goes out. But this beginning of knowledge, resting on the being and attributes of God, is a foundation that cannot be shaken. On that solid base more and more knowledge will be reared, high as heaven, wide as the universe, lasting as eternity.
The knowledge of God is the root of all knowledge. When branches are pruned from a tree and laid on the ground in the fall, they retain for a time a portion of their sap. I have seen such branches, when the spring came round, pushing forth buds like their neighbors. But very soon the slender stock of sap was exhausted, and as there was no connection with a root so as to procure a new supply, the buds withered away. How unlike the buds that spring from the branches growing in the living root!
This natural life is like a severed branch. The knowledge that springs from it is a bud put forth by the life residing in itself. When life passes, it withers away. When a human soul is, by regeneration, “rooted in Him,” transplanted into a more genial clime, that knowledge will flourish forever. Eye has not seen, nor ear heard, into what it will grow.
Excerpted from Laws from Heaven for Life on Earth by William Arnot