The Bible does not need to reveal the fact that man is a sinner. But it discloses just how grim is the prognosis. Observe the names of sins. In Numbers 15, a distinction is given between “sins of ignorance” and “sins of presumption.” The Psalmist prays (Ps. 19) that he may be “cleansed” from the first kind, and “kept back” from the last.
In Psalm 32, he looks at it from different sides. As sin, it is failure, a missing of man’s true end; as transgression, it is departure from, or offense against God’s law; as iniquity, it is wrong done to God and man. In 1 John 3:4, it is a departure from law–lawlessness. In other places of that epistle it is declared to be the opposite of light–darkness; the opposite of love–hatred; the opposite of God–it is of the wicked one.
Thus the Bible takes the strongest views of sin. And it has the right to do so because it tells us how sin may be overcome. It would be mere cruelty to enlarge to the sick man on his maladies if you had no cure. But when you do it to rouse his attention to the infallible remedy, and to the Great Physician, that is the kindest course.
The main lines of Bible teaching about the state of sin are these three: universal guilt, heart-corruption, and inherited sinfulness (original sin).
UNIVERSAL GUILT
Apart from the Bible, people know that everybody goes wrong. But the Bible teaches it with a thoroughness which the unassisted human conscience does not attain. Follow Paul’s demonstration in Romans 1 to the middle of chapter 3.
Notice the truth he is teaching there. All men, capable of conscious moral action on their own account, transgress God’s law. He works this out, step by step. The Jews who have the law do it one way; the Gentiles who don’t have the law do it another way. So he reaches his conclusion (3:9): “they are all under sin,” that all have actually sinned and in their own life and character “and come short of the glory of God.”
Why does he take such pains to prove this? That “every mouth may be stopped,” and that “all the world may be guilty before God;” that all may be convinced “there is no difference.”
The aim of this universal verdict is one of deepest kindness. It is to show that as there is “no difference,” no exception to the fact that in the sight of God every conscious human life is under guilt on account of its own sin. So also there is no difference of merit or worth before God respecting salvation. In every case, salvation is grounded in the righteousness of God in Christ, received by faith.
Thus we are taught how to use this truth rightly. To harp on this string, “all men are sinners, so you are a sinner,” may be of little use. The truth “there is no difference” can rouse the sinner against our message if we don’t understand that there is a difference in sins and sinners.
Jesus Himself said, “He that delivered Me unto thee hath the greater sin.” There is a five hundred pence debtor and a fifty pence debtor. Let us make allowance for degrees of guilt and hardening. But, then come back to the point where there is “no difference,” in that all of us, without exception, “have come short of the glory of God.”
We have failed in our chief end. Only in this way will we reach the conscience about sin. For, after all, sin has no meaning to us until we see that it is denying God His due, putting something before or instead of Him. “Against Thee, Thee only, have I sinned” (Ps. 51:4).
The right use of this verdict–the condemning sentence of God’s law against every human life–is to shut us up to Christ and His grace. It beats down that foolish hope which the unconvinced heart builds on its own fancied betterness, or not-so-badness, compared with other people. God’s holy standard disallows the plea. In this matter of acceptance with Him there are no exceptions. When the debtor has nothing to pay, a debt of fifty pence is as fatal as one of five hundred. But, then, God’s glorious grace has the same motto: “no difference”–a full and free salvation to everyone that believes.
HEART CORRUPTION
As the former was a statement of the breadth, this is of the depth to which the evil of sin has affected our nature. Not only all men, but the whole man is under its blight. Across the whole of Scripture there extends a chain of passages on this topic. Sin is something deeper than actions, or even thoughts. These are merely the fruit or outcome of it. Since its seat is in the heart, it taints the very springs of human nature. It is seated where God ought to dwell. No wonder that the work of God alone can deliver us from it.
What does “heart” in the Bible mean? It doesn’t mean that man has wholly lost the image of God and is made after the image of the devil. If so, redemption would be impossible. The heart is not the being or person of the man, but his principles of action. Being or person cannot be changed, but principles can. In conversion I don’t become another person; I get a “new heart.”
It does not mean merely the feelings as contrasted with mind or understanding. In modern language we speak of head and heart and contrast them. The Bible (especially the Old Testament) never so speaks. It puts “heart” for the whole inward nature–knowledge, feeling, imagination, will. All through the Bible, “heart” means the centerpoint of man’s moral activity.
See how this exposes the mistakes men have made about sin and its cure. They begin by confining sin to some part of man’s nature. Some say it is only his understanding that is dark. Educate, and people will all do right. Or, starve the body, humble the flesh, and so we shall get rid of sin. No! It is at the “heart” that man is wrong. That goes all through his nature and makes the rest wrong in the sight of God who “looks on the heart.”
Such is the truth of this misunderstood doctrine of “total depravity,” and the idea of the entire corruption of our nature under sin. It does not mean that every man is as bad as every other man, or as bad as he could be, or that he is unable to make a moral judgment. It means that in the heart of man are the seeds of all sorts of sins, and that this disposition affects the entire standing of man before God. What results from understanding this?
i) It leads to renouncing of human merit. If we consider the sinfulness–not of particular actions and words–but of our prevailing dispositions by nature, we see why the Bible says that, in this state, man “cannot please God.” That does not exclude man’s power (in God’s providence) to do good in natural things, in family affection and earthly government, nor even that these good doings are not acceptable to God in their own way (see Acts 10:2). But for man as he is, gaining God’s favor or deserving God’s mercy by his own merit is impossible.
ii) It is meant to lead to accepting divine grace. Since the evil is so central, the remedy lies only in the gift of a new heart. The change is not one which nature can effect on itself. It is “impossible with man.” But it is possible with God–more than possible. He has promised it and we must ask Him for it. “A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you” (Ezek. 36:26).
INHERITED SINFULNESS
Usually called original sin, it precedes, underlies, or occasions all transgression. The Bible takes the view that sin has its rise in a principle inborn with us–an evil bias, a bent which begins where we begin, grows with our growth and strengthens with our strength, unless God’s grace counterworks it. It is a propensity to evil.
A man might say, “I’ve done this one bad thing, but I mustn’t be judged by that. I’m not such a bad person. I have a good heart.” “On the contrary,” says David, “it is my nature that is bad; out of it has come this evil deed.”
Another man, untaught in the evil of sin and its mystery, may admit his evil disposition but argues, “I have sinned, but my inherited sinfulness is my excuse. I was born damaged. What else could you expect me to do?”
Paul in Romans 1 declares that while it is true some sins captivate us, men are worse than they have to be. We go looking for sin. Some sins do not entangle us, we embrace them and enjoy them, for a time at least. We need to be saved from ourselves as well as from our sins.
How does this propensity to evil relate to what the New Testament calls “the flesh”? “In me (that is in my flesh), dwelleth no good thing” (Rom. 7:18). One thing is certain: It cannot mean that all sin is from the body, for the worst sins are those of the soul. Nor can it mean that all sin is owing to having a body, for Scripture claims our bodies as the temples of the Spirit. If sin were owing to the body, salvation would be deliverance from bodily being, not the climax of it being redemption of our body.
Our Lord explains: “That which is born of the flesh is flesh” (Jn. 3:6). The sinfulness is seated neither exclusively in the body, nor in the soul. It is called “the flesh” because it comes to us by our first birth. It can only be counteracted by a second birth–a birth again from above–“that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.”
It is this new birth that deals with all aspects of sin at one time. The heart-corruption and guilt which I share with all sinners finds its answer for me individually in this blessed transaction: “For He hath made Him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him” (2 Cor. 5:21). This is solved with the introduction of a new life principle: “For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death” (Rom. 8:2). The indwelling Spirit oversees the repair of the damage done by sin in our lives, and we have the guarantee that the work will not be thwarted until it is completed when “we shall be like Him; for we shall see Him as He is.”